"They" don't talk about replenishment, only depletion.

"They" cannot afford to let you know the truth. The truth would be too much, and "their" lies could not stand up to the truth!

WHY DON'T YOU HEAR, AND WHY ARE SCHOOL KIDS NOT TAUGHT HOW NATURE REPLENISHES OZONE?

You have heard over and over what "they" claim destroys ozone, haven't you? Doesn't this one-sided treatment bother you? Only the bad depletion, never the good replenishment. Depressing! (Can you see what kind of world that "they" want and how your kids don't count except as fodder for "their" programs)? Still not with me? Consider that "they" might be purposefully decreasing ozone in order to increase uv harm!

It might be helpful to think about a time before man was here on earth to make a mess of things. Was there ozone? Of course there was! Well, how did it get there, and, since it breaks down quickly into oxygen, how does nature make and sustain some kind of equilibrium level?

Yes, lightning is sparking electricity, so lightning makes ozone directly. But, that's only part of the story. What does lightning do, especially before those evil men arrived on the planet to manage the range land and the forests?

It burns things up! Just ask the people in Florida, Mexico, Australia, and Indonesia who can remember as far back as one to two years ago.

And, guess what? Horror of environmentalist horrors! There are no catalytic converters on forest and range fires! No, not even on those forest and range fires caused by MOTHER NATURE !

No catalytic converters . . . Do you know what that means? It means that there is a whole lot of unauthorized carbon monoxide being made!

WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE! Monoxide poisoning!

But, wait, weren't there more forest fires back when there were only a few men? How could they have lived? It is not possible is it? Not with all those fires and monoxide, huh?

Haven't we concluded that there used to be huge fires burning all over the earth almost continuously?

Who does mother nature think she is . . . Dr. Jack Kevorkian with his monoxide neurosis re-inforcing monoxide death machine?

Get me a monoxide cop! Where are the monoxide cops? Where's MOTHER NATURE'S emissions test report and environmental impact statement?

WHOA! Hold on! Not to worry! Monoxide is lighter than air and rises. It rises even faster because it is hot. And, it disperses rapidly. It does not hurt people outdoors!

Monoxide quickly gets away from the source and becomes part of the "atmosphere" more quickly. It will get out to the trees and oceans before dioxide made at the same location will.

When the carbon monoxide is "out there," out of your neighborhood, out of your community, it becomes carbon dioxide. It does this because ultraviolet radiation excites the oxygen molecules so that when a monoxide molecule bumps into an excited oxygen molecule, O₂, it can snatch away one of the oxygen atoms (there are 2 oxygen atoms per oxygen molecule and nature does not like oxygen to exist in the atomic form. She prefers they be married, ie., O₂).

But, don't we have a loose oxygen atom? Not for long. It is quickly grabbed by another monoxide molecule or something else. If it should bump into another oxygen molecule, it becomes ozone (O₂ + O = O₃). IMAGINE! The by-product of converting monoxide to dioxide is ozone!

I'll wager that you did not learn that in school!

Could the decrease in the ozone layer be because we now convert all carbon directly to dioxide at the source as required by our government? The change in emissions has been so drastic that "they" have actually reduced the atmospheric level of monoxide! (((LINK TO ARTICLE RE: DECREASE IN MONOXIDE))) Almost nothing makes monoxide anymore.

Could the level of ozone trigger lightning? When nature needs more ozone, she simply sends down (or up) some lightning bolts!

When the ozone layer decreases, would you be so bold as to predict that there would soon be more lightning and more lightning caused fires? Think about it. Doesn't this seem like a better prediction than the one that guns and access to guns causes school killings? Such a prediction ignores the fact that we have had guns for years without school killings. Have you noticed that when "they" predict things will happen, things seem to happen even though there is no logical connection between the event and the reason "they" give? There were more guns around us when we were kids and there was not the mayhem. How could "they" predict that guns would lead to trouble now? (ANSWER)

As things are, the flip side of the dioxide level is the monoxide level. "They" forced the changed emissions. Since "they" control the dioxide emissions, "they" also control the monoxide emissions, and, thus, "they" control the ozone!

OLD CARS, SLASH BURNS, AND FOREST FIRES PREVENT FOREST FIRES!

Now you know why.

Something else to ponder: There is another reason why I don't believe ozone is responsible for burning eyes, noses, and throats. Exhaust from non-diesel vehicles never bothered me before the change in emission from monoxide to dioxide. How do dioxide emitting vehicles make ozone? They cannot! Also, ozone production requires ultraviolet radiation, ie., sunlight. When I walked behind my "new" (carbon dioxide spewing 1983 Honda) car at night, with the engine running, my eyes, nose, and throat burned. They burned from the CO₂! I am sure it was not from monoxide because my emissions tests showed this car made less than .01 percent (ie., less than 100 ppm, virtually non-existent - - - and newer car test at no, "zero," carbon monoxide) and over 15 percent (or over 150,000 ppm) dioxide. And, therefore, I can conclude that my eyes, nose, and throat did not burn from ozone because there was no monoxide and no light, both of which are necessary to make ozone of the non-sparking electricity variety!

And, I remember soda pop going up and out my nose. What was that stuff that made soda pop fizz?

You have been betrayed. It is time to admit it and then do something about it,